Chronicle of a Death Foretold and the Stranger Essay

Conflict Resulting From the Negative Effects of unbendable Societal Expectations in A tale of A remnant Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and The alien by Albert Camus Everyone has felt the pressure of social expectations during their carriage succession. The negative effects edict brings on ones behavior heap lead to a feeling of rejection towards the mass who do non conform to get word those standards.Gabriel Garcia Marquez, author of account state handst of a Death Foretold, and Albert Camus, author of The weird, both construct the outside chaste divergence of hostel versus the relay transmitter in order to critique the fashion rules of order fails to accept the moral value of the tidy sum who differ from the norm. In fib of a Death Foretold, Gabriel Garcia Marquez emphasizes the central struggle of cabaret versus the protagonist, ground on beliefs and value, done the contr oversy leading up to the capital punishment of capital of Chile Nasar, which i s based on family celebrate and pre-marital waken.When Pedro and Pablo Vicario ask their sister, Angela Vicario, who had stolen her virginity, her response is described as She only took the time necessary to aver the name and she nailed it to the wall with her well-aimed dart, like a just nowterfly with no will whose reprove has already been written. capital of Chile Nasar, she base tongue to(47). Describing Angelas response as only took the time necessary indicates that she is trying to put the turn on on Santiago, making him a scapegoat, in order to treasure the true patch who took her virginity before marriage.In the Latin American guild, where the setting of the novella takes place, it is non pleasing for a wo globe to bedevil pre-marital sex due to the beliefs and morals of Catholics. Santiago is correspond as the only whenterfly whose sentence had already been written. Even though thither is no evidence Santiago took Angelas virginity, it is the twins tariff to entertain their sister. Therefore, Pedro and Pablo Vicario set out to kill the soldiery who had stolen their sisters virginity, Santiago Nasar, in order to cheer their family.The tally carve up everyone in town roughly their device to murder Santiago, that the tidy sum in the community doubt their intentions twenty-two hoi polloi decl bed they had heard everything said, and they all coincided in the impression that the only precedent the brothers had said it was so that someone would mother over to hear them(51). The people in the town who coincide in the impression that the only intellect the brothers had said it was so that someone would come over to hear them shows how oblivious the town motivate owards a social fragments support.Society looks past at the f coif that a murder is about to occur, but focuses on the purpose family honour, which is exceedingly respected. Since it is un bankable for a female to know sex before marriage, Santiago is viewed in a negative light by purchase order because he is accused of taking the virginity of an unmarried wo soldiery. The debate surrounding Santiagos termination highlights the skirmish amidst society and the protagonist, where Santiago is a hu creation who is accused of committing an act that society does non accept.Albert Camus, in The Stranger, constructs the protagonist, Monsieur Meursault, as a humankind who has absurdist morals and values, which society does non accept. Meursault has an internal relationship with Marie Cardona, a former typist, but the connection does non go beyond a corporeal attraction she valued to know if I loved her. I answered the same track I had the hold out time, that it didnt mean anything but that I in all likelihood didnt love her (41).By Meursault stating it didnt mean anything and I probably didnt love her highlights his absurdist views on sustenance he believes life contains no purpose, in that locationfore he cannot love Marie becaus e loving Marie would give life a purpose, which Meursault does not believe. He simply associates with Marie, because he likes being approximately her. There is no hire for an frantic connection because the physical appearance of her is congenial enough. Absurdism is not accredited in society therefore it does not accept Meursault.He is an outsider in a solid ground he did not choose. Meursault is a man who does not show his emotions very well, but instead focuses on his physical need I explained to him, however, that my nature was such that my physical needs oft got in the way of my feelings (65). Meursault saying that my physical needs often got in the way of my feelings emphasizes the simplistic life he livea life without meaning. Showing emotions would signify a life with purpose, which Meursault does not believe.The Algerian society, in which the novella takes place, does not accept the type of life-style Meursault lives and believes every life should be lived with a pur pose. Societys expectations clash with Meursaults values because his beliefs and outlooks on life are not accepted by society, which sets up the external conflict between the two. In the external conflict between society and the protagonist, Garcia Marquez emphasizes the negative effects society has on a person who goes against the social norm by showing the biased opinions towards the Pedro and Pablo Vicario regarding Santiagos murder.After brutally stab Santiago to death, the Vicario twins sprint to the church service to inform the priest of their barbaric act Both were exhausted from the barbarous fiddle of death, and their clothes and arms were soaked and their faces smeared with stew and still living blood but the priest recalled the surrender as an act of great high-handedness(49). The priest work the murder an act of great dignity shows how, in the Latin American society, family honor is highly valued, no matter how cold it is taken. Even though the twins nurture comm itted the worst crime imaginable, it is acceptable because it was done in order to protect their family.Pedro and Pablo Vicario are viewed as meeting expectations, as opposed to Santiago, who fails to follow them. When the crime was brought to courtroom, the twins had already won before it yet started The lawyer stood by the thesis of the homicide in legitimate defense of honor, which was upheld by the court in good faith, and the twins stated at the end of the trial that they would render done it again a m times over for the same reason (48). The lawyer stating the homicide as a legitimate defense of honor verifies that society values family honor over a mans life.The court case represents the conflict of society against Santiago and since he goes against societys values, Santiago ends up dying, indicating societys victory. The twins do not receive any severe punishment, because of their intentions to protect their family. Through Santiagos death, Garcia Marquez stresses the i ll effects society can nourish on someone whose beliefs differ from societal standards. Camus constructs Meursaults trial to critique societys lack of acceptance towards the people who do not meet expectations. throughout the court case, Meursault is quickly judged by the public prosecuting attorney due to his actions concerning his mothers death, He said the truth was that I didnt have a soul and that zero point human, not one of my moral principles that governs mens hearts, was within my reach (101). The prosecutor bluntly stating that Meursault didnt have a soul and is incapable of having moral principles that governs mens hearts highlights how society does not understand Meursaults morals and values, indeed critiques his character and neglects him. Meursault is looked down upon because of how he acted on the day of Mamans funeral.He does not express feelings towards his mothers death because he is an absurdist and believes death is inevitable. Society believes that there is purpose to every societal extremitys life, and since Meursault shares absurdist views, he is not accepted by society. To close his final sway against Meursault, the prosecutor states, I ask you for this mans headnever as strongly as today have I felt this painful duty made easier, light, clearer by the certain companionship of a sacred imperative and by the horror I feel when I look into a mans face and all I sympathize is a monster. (102). The whole trial is based around Meursaults character, and him being called a monster stresses the fact that society is noncompliant to accept anyone who does not follow the expectations. Meursault does not share the same views that society pauperizations, and as a result, he is rejected because of his moral values. By asking for this mans head the prosecutor shows how society neglects the people who share several(predicate) views and therefore want them out of society completely.Camus uses the trial and Meursaults crime to emphasize the external conflict of society versus the protagonist, Meursault, to demonstrate how society does not accept people who share different moral values. The negative effects society has on the people who do not meet expectations are emphasized through the external conflict, based of moral values, between the protagonist and society in the Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and The Stranger by Albert Camus. Both novellas show the bad consequence faced by the protagonist, who do not conform to societal expectations, which plainly resulted in death.